Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Home Print this page Email this page
Users Online:: 11773
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2007  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 48-52

Peri-Operative complications of spinal anaesthesia: A report of 98 cases in one nigerian hospital


1 Department of Surgery, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
2 Department of Anaesthesia, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Correspondence Address:
S Fyneface-Ogan
Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, CHOBA-Port Harcourt
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Background: Although spinal anaesthesia is easy and safe, it is not without life-threatening complications. Aim: The study sought to highlight the common perioperative complications of spinal anaesthesia as seen in the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, and their management. Method: Consecutive elective surgical and gynaecological patients were recruited to study the pattern of complications following spinal anaesthesia. An anaesthetist other than the one administering the anaesthetic answered questions relating to the potential risks of the anaesthetic technique. There were no restrictions on the staff anaesthetists in performing anaesthesia in these patients. A proforma containing the patient's demographic data, American Society of Anaesthesiologists score and secondary outcome data including, total dose of ephedrine used, surgeon's satisfaction, level of block attained, types of complications observed and treatment given, indication for surgery, were kept for each patient recruited for this study. The ranks of the attending anaesthetist were also recorded. Results: One hundred and fifteen elective surgical and gynaecological patients were recruited into this study. Fifty-six patients (57.14%) were females while 42 (42.86%) were males years with a mean age of 33.3 ±4.7 years. There were twelve different complications following the procedure in 40 patients (40.82%). Out of the number, shivering (19 patients) appeared to be the commonest constituting 47.5%. Five patients (12.5%) developed hypotension that was promptly treated while bradycardia occurred in 3 (7.5%) patients. Most of the complications were promptly treated. There was no mortality. Conclusion: Perioperative complications due to spinal anaesthesia were common. Shivering appeared to be the commonest form of morbidity. Good conduct of subarachnoid block and meticulous monitoring are critical to a good outcome.


[PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed982    
    Printed73    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded115    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal